Madison, James -- Letter to Edward Livingston (10 Jul 1822)

Dave — Wed, 27 May 2015 13:47:30 +0000

And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.

James Madison (1751-1836) American statesman, political theorist, US President (1809-17)
Letter to Edward Livingston (10 Jul 1822)

Jackson, Robert H. -- Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 26-27 (1947) [dissent]

Dave — Fri, 09 May 2008 21:35:13 +0000

The effect of the religious freedom Amendment to our Constitution was to take every form of propagation of religion out of the realm of things which could directly or indirectly be made public business, and thereby be supported in whole or in part at taxpayers’ expense. That is a difference which the Constitution sets up between religion and almost every other subject matter of legislation, a difference which goes to the very root of religious freedom and which the Court is overlooking today. This freedom was first in the Bill of Rights because it was first in the forefathers’ minds; it was set forth in absolute terms, and its strength is its rigidity. It was intended not only to keep the states’ hands out of religion, but to keep religion’s hands off the state, and, above all, to keep bitter religious controversy out of public life by denying to every denomination any advantage from getting control of public policy or the public purse.

Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954) US Supreme Court Justice (1941-54), lawyer, jurist, politician
Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 26-27 (1947) [dissent]
(Source)

WIST Quotations

Madison, James -- Letter to Edward Livingston (10 Jul 1822)

Jackson, Robert H. -- Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 26-27 (1947) [dissent]