<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<!--  do not duplicate title bloginfo_rss('name'); wp_title_rss(); -->
<channel>

	<title>WIST Quotations</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wist.info/topic/renunciation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wist.info</link>
	<description>Wish I&#039;d Said That!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 06:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>
<atom:link rel="self" href="https://wist.info/topic/renunciation/feed/"/>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43606282</site>		<item>

                <!-- DCH Modify the title to give the category (quote author) at the beginning of it. -->
		<title>Montesquieu -- Spirit of Laws [The Spirit of the Laws; De l’esprit des lois], Book  4, ch.  5 (4.5) (1748) [tr. Cohler/Miller/Stone (1989)]</title>
		<link>https://wist.info/montesquieu/82465/</link>
		<comments>https://wist.info/montesquieu/82465/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 23:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Montesquieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law-abiding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawfulness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political virtue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-sacrifice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wist.info/?p=82465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political virtue is a renunciation of oneself, which is always a very painful thing. One can define this virtue as love of the laws and the homeland. This love, requiring a continuous preference of the public interest over one&#8217;s own, produces all the individual virtues; they are only that preference. [La vertu politique est un [&#8230;]]]></description>
        <!-- DCH Insert author info (category description) and put the extra info (MORE) below that. -->
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political virtue is a renunciation of oneself, which is always a very painful thing. One can define this virtue as love of the laws and the homeland. This love, requiring a continuous preference of the public interest over one&#8217;s own, produces all the individual virtues; they are only that preference.</p>
<p><em>[La vertu politique est un renoncement à soi-même, qui est toujours une chose très-pénible. On peut définir cette vertu, l’amour des loix &#038; de la patrie. Cet amour, demandant une préférence continuelle de l’intérêt public au sien propre, donne toutes les vertus particulieres: elles ne sont que cette préférence.]</em></p>
<br><b>Charles-Lewis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu</b> (1689–1755) French political philosopher<br><i>Spirit of Laws [The Spirit of the Laws; De l’esprit des lois]</i>, Book  4, ch.  5 (4.5) (1748) [tr. Cohler/Miller/Stone (1989)] 
						<br><br><span class="cite">
						

(<a href="https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/De_l%E2%80%99esprit_des_lois_(%C3%A9d._Nourse)/Livre_4#:~:text=mais%20la%20vertu,que%20cette%20pr%C3%A9f%C3%A9rence.">Source (French)</a>). Other translations:<br><br>

<blockquote>Virtue is a self-renunciation which is always arduous and painful. This virtue may be defined, the love of the laws and of our country. As this love requires a constant preference of public to private interest, it is the source of all the particular virtues; for they are nothing more than this very preference itself.<br>
[tr. <a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Spirit_of_Laws_(1758)/Book_IV#:~:text=virtue%20is%20a,very%20preference%20itself.">Nugent</a> (1750)] </blockquote><br>

<blockquote>Virtue is a self-renunciation, which is very arduous and painful.  This virtue may be defined as the love of the laws and of our country. As such love requires a constant preference of public to private interest, it is the source of all private virtues [....]<br>
[<a href="https://www.google.com/books/edition/Century_Path/CDxDAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22self-renunciation,+which+is+very+arduous+and+painful%22&pg=RA22-PA19&printsec=frontcover">E.g.</a> (1904)]</blockquote><br>

<blockquote>Virtue is self-renunciation, which is always a very hard thing. This virtue may be defined as love of the laws and of the homeland. As this love requires a continual preference for the public interest over one’s own, it confers all the separate virtues: they are nothing more than this preference.<br>
[tr. <a href="https://montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/spip.php?article2608#:~:text=virtue%20is%20self,than%20this%20preference.">Stewart</a> (2018)]</blockquote><br>						</span>
					]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://wist.info/montesquieu/82465/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">82465</post-id>	</item>
		<item>

                <!-- DCH Modify the title to give the category (quote author) at the beginning of it. -->
		<title>West, Rebecca -- &#8220;Pleasure Be Your Guide,&#8221; The Nation, &#8220;Living Philosophies&#8221; series #10 (25 Feb 1939)</title>
		<link>https://wist.info/west-rebecca/46451/</link>
		<comments>https://wist.info/west-rebecca/46451/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[West, Rebecca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gratification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pleasure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-restraint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wist.info/?p=46451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The belief that all higher life is governed by the idea of renunciation poisons our moral life by engendering vanity and egotism. But if we take gratification as our ideal we thereby impose on ourselves a program of self-restraint; for if we claim that we are under the necessity of learning all that we can [&#8230;]]]></description>
        <!-- DCH Insert author info (category description) and put the extra info (MORE) below that. -->
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The belief that all higher life is governed by the idea of renunciation poisons our moral life by engendering vanity and egotism. But if we take gratification as our ideal we thereby impose on ourselves a program of self-restraint; for if we claim that we are under the necessity of learning all that we can about reality, and that we learn most through pleasure, we must also admit that we are under the necessity of hearing what our fellow-creatures learn about it and of working out a system by which we will curb our pleasures so that they do not interfere with those of others. If, however, we claim that it is by renunciation that we achieve wisdom, we have no logical reason for feeling any disapproval of conditions that thrust pain and deprivation on others.</p>
<br><b>Rebecca West</b> (1892–1983) British author, journalist, literary critic,  travel writer [pseud. for Cicily Isabel Fairfield]<br>&#8220;Pleasure Be Your Guide,&#8221; <i>The Nation</i>, &#8220;Living Philosophies&#8221; series #10 (25 Feb 1939) 
						<br><br><span class="cite">
						

<a href="https://www.google.com/books/edition/I_Believe_by_W_H_Auden_and_Others/_OgeAQAAMAAJ?gbpv=1&bsq=%22all%20higher%20life%20is%20governed%22">Adapted</a> into Clifton Fadiman, <i>I Believe: The Personal Philosophies of Certain Eminent Men and Women of Our Time</i> (1952).








						</span>
					]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://wist.info/west-rebecca/46451/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46451</post-id>	</item>
		<item>

                <!-- DCH Modify the title to give the category (quote author) at the beginning of it. -->
		<title>Russell, Bertrand -- Lecture (1948-12-26), &#8220;Social Cohesion and Human Nature,&#8221; Reith Lecture, &#8220;Authority and the Individual&#8221; No. 1, BBC Radio</title>
		<link>https://wist.info/russell-bertrand/20890/</link>
		<comments>https://wist.info/russell-bertrand/20890/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Russell, Bertrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deprivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restraint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unnatural]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wist.info/?p=20890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We now know that a life which goes excessively against natural impulse is one which is likely to involve effects of strain that may be quite as bad as indulgence in forbidden impulses would have been. People who live a life which is unnatural beyond a point are likely to be filled with envy, malice [&#8230;]]]></description>
        <!-- DCH Insert author info (category description) and put the extra info (MORE) below that. -->
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now know that a life which goes excessively against natural impulse is one which is likely to involve effects of strain that may be quite as bad as indulgence in forbidden impulses would have been. People who live a life which is unnatural beyond a point are likely to be filled with envy, malice and all uncharitableness. They may develop strains of cruelty, or, on the other hand, they may so completely lose all joy in life that they have no longer any capacity for effort.</p>
<br><b>Bertrand Russell</b> (1872–1970) English mathematician and philosopher<br>Lecture (1948-12-26), &#8220;Social Cohesion and Human Nature,&#8221; Reith Lecture, &#8220;Authority and the Individual&#8221; No. 1, BBC Radio 
						<br><br><span class="cite">
						

<a href="https://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rmhttp/radio4/transcripts/1948_reith1.pdf#page=4">Transcript</a>.<br><br> 

Collected, with edits, as <a href="https://archive.org/details/AuthorityAndTheIndividual_656/page/n25/mode/2up?q=%22excessively+against%22">collected, with edits</a>, in <i>Authority and the Individual</i> (1949). In the book, the first sentence begins, "We now know that a life which goes against natural impulse beyond a point is one which is likely to involve ..."



						</span>
					]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://wist.info/russell-bertrand/20890/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20890</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
