<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<!--  do not duplicate title bloginfo_rss('name'); wp_title_rss(); -->
<channel>

	<title>WIST Quotations</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wist.info/topic/validity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wist.info</link>
	<description>Wish I&#039;d Said That!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>
<atom:link rel="self" href="https://wist.info/topic/validity/feed/"/>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43606282</site>		<item>

                <!-- DCH Modify the title to give the category (quote author) at the beginning of it. -->
		<title>Sagan, Carl -- &#8220;The Burden of Skepticism,&#8221; Pasadena lecture (1987)</title>
		<link>https://wist.info/sagan-carl/10073/</link>
		<comments>https://wist.info/sagan-carl/10073/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sagan, Carl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[close-mindedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curiosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gullibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wist.info/?p=10073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me what is called for is an exquisite balance between two conflicting needs: the most skeptical scrutiny of all hypotheses that are served up to us and at the same time a great openness to new ideas. Obviously those two modes of thought are in some tension. But if you are able [&#8230;]]]></description>
        <!-- DCH Insert author info (category description) then (Source) and then put the extra info (MORE) below that. -->
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me what is called for is an exquisite balance between two  conflicting needs: the most skeptical scrutiny of all hypotheses that  are served up to us and at the same time a great openness to new ideas. Obviously those two modes of thought are in some tension. But if you are able to exercise only one of these modes, whichever one it is, you&#8217;re in deep trouble.</p>
<p>If you are only skeptical, then no new ideas make it through to you. You  never learn anything new. You become a crotchety old person convinced  that nonsense is ruling the world. (There is, of course, much data to  support you.) But every now and then, maybe once in a hundred cases, a new idea turns out to be on the mark, valid and wonderful. If you are too much in the habit of being skeptical about everything, you are going to miss or resent it, and either way you will be standing in the way of understanding and progress.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you are open to the point of  gullibility and have not an ounce of skeptical sense in you, then you  cannot distinguish useful ideas from the worthless ones. If all ideas  have equal validity then you are lost, because then, it seems to me, no  ideas have any validity at all.</p>
<br><b>Carl Sagan</b> (1934-1996) American scientist and writer<br>&#8220;The Burden of Skepticism,&#8221; Pasadena lecture (1987) 
									<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(<a href="https://archive.org/stream/TheBurdenOfSkepticism-CarlSagan/sagan-skeptism_djvu.txt#maincontent:~:text=It%20seems%20to%20me%20what%20is,all." target="_blank">Source</a>)
										<br><br><span class="cite">
						

Reprinted in <i>The Skeptical Inquirer</i> (Fall 1987).						</span>
					]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://wist.info/sagan-carl/10073/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10073</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
